Prim prefix4/16/2023 ![]() ![]() 2022 These may seem like isolated incidents, but make no mistake: These women are buying into a dangerous narrative that has helped more than 100 anti- trans bills (and counting) make their way through various state legislatures in the last year alone. 2022 Meanwhile, the anti- trans bills in state legislatures, the social-media attacks and the rise in misinformation has an impact. Pam Kragen, San Diego Union-Tribune, 21 Nov. 2023 Watching this joyful and carefree tale unfold onstage in light of the rising number of anti- trans bills and laws nationwide felt emotional and cathartic. 2023 Nationally, over 200 anti- trans bills have been introduced this year, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. This is because the new definition already takes care of applying the :> to the rest of the path.Adjective In 2021, Reeves passed an anti- trans sports bill that barred transgender girls from playing on teams that align with their gender identity. We have to use AuthPrefix a little differently now: AuthPrefix ("email" :> ReqBody ' AuthEmailRequest :> PostNoContent) That way we won't end the route fragment in a Symbol. The solution? Perhaps give AuthPrefix a type parameter, like type AuthPrefix restofpath = BackendPrefix :> "auth" :> restofpath (You might wonder, how come that paths like "foo" :> "bar" :> Post ' User do work? The reason is that a fully applied Post has kind Type, a fully applied :> also has kind Type, and :> associates to the right, like "foo" :> ("bar" :> Post ' User), so it all checks out.) The kinds don't match and that causes the type error. However, in the type-level expression BackendPrefix :> "auth" the kind of "auth" is Symbol, which is the kind of type-level strings. This is the kind of "normal" Haskell types like Int or Bool that have lifted values. Notice that the right part must have kind *, also known as Type. The definition of :> is data (path :: k) :> (a :: *) Is there a way to prefix some routes with one prefix, and the other routes with a different prefix, when using generics in Servant?.What does the above error mean, and can I use something like type AuthPrefix = BackendPrefix :> "auth" to create a more complex prefix?.So I googled and found you can do this when not using generic you can do: type APIv1 = "api" :> "v1" :> APIīut I couldn't figure out how to do this with generics. > 34 | type AuthPrefix = BackendPrefix :> "auth" > In the type declaration for ‘AuthPrefix’ In the second argument of ‘(:>)’, namely ‘"auth"’.Type AuthPrefix = BackendPrefix :> "auth" However, I now want to change the "auth" prefix to "backend/auth". ![]() The first two use the same prefix "backend", and all other's have an "auth" prefix. Type PostAuthEmail = AuthPrefix :> "email" :> ReqBody ' AuthEmailRequest :> PostNoContent Type GetAuthVerifyEmailToken = AuthPrefix :> "verify" :> "email" :> Capture "token" JWT :> RedirectResponse ' NoContent Type GetReadiness = BackendPrefix :> "readiness" :> Get ' Text Type GetLiveness = BackendPrefix :> "liveness" :> Get ' Text GetAuthVerifyEmailToken :: route :- GetAuthVerifyEmailToken, I'm using Servant generic, and have a datatype for my routes: data Routes route = Routes ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |